Jul. 9th, 2015

chris_gerrib: (Me 2)
As you may have heard, yesterday the New York Stock Exchange and United Airlines both had significant computer failures. There were a lot of questions to the effect of "are these events related?" Well, maybe not, because random events don't look random. As explained very clearly at this site (PDF), random events can be subject to a "Poisson burst." Poisson was a French mathematician who was tasked with figuring out why Prussian army officers kept getting killed in riding accidents.

Consider your work day. If you're like me, at various times of the day, people call or stop by your office with questions. But this rarely happens on a regular schedule. I, for example, can go an hour with no calls then in the same 10 minute span I get two calls, three important emails and somebody knocking on my door. This is a Poisson burst - a bunch of random events that randomly happen at the same time.

Poisson developed an equation to predict how often these events burst. So, using an example from the link, consider shark attacks. If we have an average of two attacks per year, using the equation, we have a 1% chance of six attacks per year (or once every 50 years) and a 13% chance of no attacks on a given year (one year out of seven is shark-less).

Another example of a Poisson burst is birthdays. There's a 1 in 365 chance that you have the same birthday as another person. But in a random group of 30 people, there's a 70% chance two people share the same birthday. In a group of 100 people, it's 99%.

The human mind is trained to look for patterns. (The saber-toothed tiger always attacks on Tuesdays.) But sometimes, there's no pattern to detect. (Casinos make money off of this human training. For example, there's an electronic display next to every roulette wheel in a casino telling you what hit recently.) Part of managing a business, or life, is determining if the perceived pattern is real or random.
chris_gerrib: (Me 2)
Some people feel compelled to slow down and gawk at car accidents on the highway. I feel compelled to point out stupidity on the Internet.

We are told that the Sad Puppy-related boycott of Tor Books has had a "six figure impact" on Tor sales. Tor is a unit of Macmillan, which is owned by Holtzbrinck, a German conglomerate. Per the later's web page, Macmillan's revenue last year was 721 million Euros. As of this writing, that's 793 million dollars.

Six figures is a rounding error to Macmillan. Somehow I doubt the good folks at Macmillan are spending a lot of time on this.

(Feel free to confirm all of the above via your favorite search engine. I've got bigger fish to fry.)

ETA 7/11/15: from Jason Sanford absolutely no detectable effect on Tor sales.

Profile

chris_gerrib: (Default)
chris_gerrib

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 02:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios