chris_gerrib: (Default)
In an effort to reverse the drought of postings here as of late, a few semi-random thoughts.

1) Personal Update: I am in Westville Il, where I was raised and my parents still reside for the rest of the week. On Monday, I attended the local American Legion's Memorial Day service, which was well-executed and surprisingly moving. I also won a shotgun at a fundraiser for the Westville Sportsman's Club.

2) I found a link to somebody who wonders how much of the disfunction we see from are Tech Business Overlords is a mid-life crisis. I have to admit it's an interesting idea.

3) I've said on many occasions that small towns are not Mayberry RFD. Here's a true story: The Story Of Ken McElroy, The Vicious Town Bully Who Was Eventually Killed By The People He Terrorized. I just started a science fictional novel in which a character like him may appear.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
There are scams targeting everybody in every walk of life, but in my other job, writing, I find there are several persistent types of scams. Anon, a list, but first a general thought as to why.

Writers have a story they want to tell. They think it's a good story, because they like it, and they usually have somebody else who tells them that they like it. (That somebody may be their mother, who kept their kindergarten fingerpainting on the refrigerator until it yellowed with age, but Dear Old Mom is a somebody.) So, it is very easy for a writer to become convinced that if they just Got The Word Out people would buy and like their stuff. Alas, this is not entirely true - you can get the word out to me about your gay Regency romance until you're blue in the face but I'm not buying it. (Not saying there's not a market for that, just that I'm not a member of that market.)

Herewith cometh the list:

1) Interviews: This is (to me) a fairly new one. Somebody with a Filipino accent and a bad VoIP line calls you and asks you to appear on a TV interview. A bit of Googling on the interviewer's name will produce a number of hits proclaiming them to be an "award-winning TV journalist." A deeper look will reveal that these links are self-referential and that the person in question used to work on-air for a major market US TV station but is no longer affiliated with it. The scam is that if you want your interview to stay up on their sparsely-visited website for more than an instant, you need to pay. You are also heavily encouraged to pay for (scattershot and spam-y) marketing to drive traffic to said website.

2) Marketing & PR firms: This is a more ongoing and broader category. It runs the gambit from the Filipino calling you to be a publicist and represent your book at international book fairs to websites promising to market your book to their "thousands of online followers." Frankly, since I don't like to talk to marketers on the phone, I have no idea if the "publicists" do anything. The online folks will at least put your ad on their feed, but I find that I typically have better uses for my money. (We all have people we follow on socials who are constantly plugging something - when was the last time you actually clicked on a link they sent you?)

3) Publishing sites: This is the granddaddy of them all, going back to the "vanity presses" of yore. The harder they work to proclaim that "we want to get you published" (bonus points if they mention "New York publishing gatekeepers") the less likely it is that you'll get anything of value back. Basically, you (over)pay, they deliver just enough so that you can't sue then they laugh all the way to the bank.

Again - writers have a story they want to tell, and there are a host of people who promise you that they can help. For a price, of course.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Watching

I have been fond of criticizing literary fiction as "a book written by a male middle-aged professor of English Lit, starring a male middle-aged professor of English Lit who discovers that having sex with an undergrad really fucks up his life." Last night I watched the much-hyped movie Babygirl and felt it was a sex-swapped example of literary fiction.

So, in the movie, the then 56-year-old Kidman plays a CEO who has an affair with a 20-something intern. There's a bit of (very mild) kinkiness in their relationship but plot-wise it's pretty standard fare. I do give props to Kidman as her role requires a lot of vulnerability. Overall, I found the movie merely okay, I think because I found it extremely predictable.

Writing

In writing notes, I am 95% finished with a submittable draft of my thriller novel "What the Bank Robber Saw." The book, set in a fictional small East Central Illinois town, stars a bank robber who has unexpected complications after robbing a bank. It's based on an idea I've been noodling with for at least a decade, that of a smart bank robber who only robs one bank a year.

In other writing notes, I received editorial notes on my science fiction novel "Gunmaker" and am 99% finished with my response to same. Go me?
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I am in Westville for the weekend because I have a book reading / signing at the St. Joseph Township Library on Monday at 6:00 PM.

In related writing program-related activities, I have an author interview / spotlight up on J. Scott Coatsworth's site. You can read it here.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Last night I went out to my local Mexican restaurant for dinner. They still had the special Valentine's Day menu up, and at the recommendation of the staff I ordered their steak dinner. It came with something called "esquites" which I had never heard of. I put that into Google Translate and got back "sky."

Esquites is "Mexican Street Corn Salad." It's very tasty. The bigger point is this - translation is an art, not a science.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Over the weekend, I've added over 6,000 words to my latest novel "What the Bank Robber Saw." A key plot point in the book is that there's internal fraud going on at the same bank branch as the one our robber hit and saw what he saw. So I ended up spending a lot of time figuring out exactly how that fraud worked, then some more time explaining it to the reader. Additionally, based on comments from my writing group, I had to flesh out the motivations for one of my characters. Finally I had to add an additional wrap-up chapter.

Things are coming together.

Complete!

Feb. 8th, 2025 12:31 pm
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Complete at a very short (too short to market) 42,000 words, my latest novel "What the Bank Robber Saw."
chris_gerrib: (Default)
First, if you're curious about where authors get our ideas, please stop by author John Scalzi's blog and read about The Big Ideas for my latest book!

Second, comes news today that TGI Fridays in Darien (the town wherein I live) is closing. I did my part - I haven't been in the place in years!

I don't actually know why I stopped going - the place just fell out of the rotation and never got back in.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
In a break from politics, have some thoughts on the process of writing.

In my other job, writing, I have discovered that (for me) every novel is different, forcing me to change my processes accordingly. In the case of my current WIP, working title "What the Bank Robber Saw," I'm barely a third of the way through the first draft.

Despite that, I found that I had to write the last chapter, which I did over the last weekend. I needed that written so I have something to aim for going forward.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Two thoughts:

1) It's alive, alive I tell you! (My book, that is - I just got a proof copy.)

2) Another of my works-in-progress features people making moonshine (in space, to be exact). Here's a link to an interesting article about moonshine in Ukraine.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
First, my latest novel, the thriller Strawberry Gold, will be out on December 16. In the meantime, I have electronic copies available for people to review – please DM me if you are interested.

Second, over the weekend I had some time to kill and access to a bookstore, so I bought and read C. J. Box’s novel Three-inch Teeth. I was vaguely familiar with Box’s work, having watched the TV series based on his novels. I did not know that this book was #24 in the Joe Pickett series. Reading the book, I learned a couple of things.

First, I saw how to write book #24 of a series and making it readable to somebody who had not read the previous 23. Second, and this is not a spoiler as it’s in the first chapters, but I saw something that will hopefully help me on my latest WIP. Specifically, there are two independent sets of villains in this book. The reader knows this, but the characters don’t, and watching everybody twist around was neat.

Not related to Three-inch Teeth but to my WIP, I had an epiphany. I need to be very clear and explicit, at least in my mind, as to what motivates my characters. Fortunately, I recently became a Certified Scrum Product Owner (CSPO). One of the things we learned in that course was how to build Personas. These are fictional people who buy and use our products. So, in my copious free time, I shall be building personas of my characters.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Some Random Thoughts, only related by being in my brain:

Random Thought #1

I was contemplating dinner last night, and I thought about going out to the local country club. Then I asked myself why? They've changed the main venue to a sports bar. It's nice, and there's nothing wrong with it, but it's very generic. There's frankly no particular reason to go there, so I didn't.

Random Thought #2

I had to get some work done on my car, and so I was exposed to daytime TV while in the dealer's waiting room. Doctor Phil had as a guest some 17-year-old who was dating a 30-year-old man. Her man had a history of beating on and cheating on his exes, but since he hadn't (yet) beat on or cheated on her, she was still good with him. After a commercial break or two, we learned that the girl's mother alternated between neglect and abuse and that the girl's father was AWOL.

In what I suspect is a case of the blind squirrel finding an acorn, Doctor Phil said that sometimes people focus so much on what they are running from that they don't look at what they are running towards.

Random Thought #3

I am what's politely called a "discovery writer" which means that when I start writing I don't have a firm outline or plan as to what's going to happen in my books. Sometimes, as in the current WIP, working title "What the Bank Robber Saw" that means I write myself into a corner and then need to back myself out of same.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
In my other day job, writing, I sometimes get asked where I get my ideas. I was reminded about that this morning when I saw a headline in my newsfeed saying "career bank robber caught."

Years ago, I worked at a bank, and one of our branches was hit by a career bank robber. He was in and out in 5 minutes and cleaned the branch out, leaving just a few stacks of ones and fives. That led to an idea - a career bank robber sees something at a robbery which gets him out of the rob 'em and leave 'em mindset.

A decade later, I'm still trying to convert that idea into a novel. Ideas are cheap - plots are expensive. Thus endeth the lesson.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Netflix's algorithm is pushing the 2020 film Inheritance on people. Last night, it was in the top 10. I recommend skipping it, as it violates two major principles of storytelling, namely, it's an idiot plot and it breaks Chekhov's gun principle. Herewith, non-spoilery explanations of both failures.

Idiot Plot: An idiot plot is one in which the plot only works if the characters are idiots. In this movie, there are two violations. First, there's a paragraph of dialog which was withheld for no reason except convenience of the screenwriters. Second one character did something at significant personal effort for decades when he could have easily done something else, again, solely for the screenwriter's convenience.

Chekhov's gun: Named after a Russian playwright, the principle is that if you show a gun on the wall in Act 1, it needs to be fired in Act 3. Here we have a reverse failure - there's a reveal in Act 3 that should have been hinted at in Act 1.

In short, fight the algorithm and skip "Inheritance." You'll thank me later.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I recently had a conversation with a friend and they asked me how much it cost me to publish my books. The answer is "zero" which surprised them. The fact that they are surprised is (in my view) a sad commentary. The persistent drumbeat and marketing dollars spent by "publishing" companies offering to for a fee "publish" your book has become pervasive.

If anybody is charging you to publish your book, they are not a publisher. They are offering print and fulfillment services and you are the publisher. A publisher handles or contracts with others to handle and pays for:
1) Editing and proofreading
2) Cover design and interior layout
3) Fulfillment - AKA "getting the book into the hands of paying customers"
4) Marketing - even if it's just uploading the information to a web page

To be clear, there's nothing wrong with being your own publisher. Now, like many authors, some of my books "reverted" back to me. In my case, the publisher went out of business. So, I re-issued them and became the publisher. My point though is this - writers get paid, publishers pay. Understand which side of the fence you're on.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
While I was on the cruise, I mentioned to several people in casual conversation that I completed the first draft of my fourth novel on this ship. One of the people I said that to told me that he has a degree in English Literature, although he’s not using it at the moment. (He is a bartender at what’s apparently a high-end bar in Orlando Florida.)

The man I was talking to said that what was stopping him from writing was fear that people would think his writing sucked. I did my best to encourage him that the world would not end if somebody told him his writing was bad. In fact, I said, writing is like golf or bartending – part of how you get better is to have people critique you.

Writing for publication is not for the thin-skinned.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I recently watched the 2019 film Serenity. this was relentlessly recommended to me by Amazon Prime, and represented by the trailer as a modern film noir. That was mostly a lie.

Again, in writing, one can learn from bad writing, and in this case Serenity was a master class. The film opens with a lengthy segment in which Matthew McConaughey's character, as the captain of a deep sea fishing charter boat, obsesses about catching a very large tuna. Then it segues into a story in which Anne Hathaway's character tries to get McConaughey's character to kill her abusive husband. About 75% of the way through the story, we learn that everything we've seen is merely a computer game, written by an abused kid, and that McConaughey's character is a representation of the kid's dad who was killed in Iraq.

When we start to tell a story, we make a promise to the audience about what kind of story we're writing. This movie completely breaks that promise. There's a reason you've not heard of this movie.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
At Capricon, I attended a panel called "the heroine's journey." The room was packed and the panel was eye-opening. I left the panel and immediately ordered my copy of the book The Heroine's Journey: For Writers, Readers, and Fans of Pop Culture. It arrived yesterday and I started reading it last night.

First, the heroine doesn't have to be a female in this journey. Harry Potter is on a heroine's journey while Wonder Woman in the 2017 movie of the same name is on a hero's journey. So, two thoughts.

1) The book I just sold, Strawberry Gold, is a heroine's journey. In the heroine's journey, loss of family is the spur to action and the protagonist needs help from friends. Both of those are true with my book.

2) My current work-in-progress, a science fiction novel called Gunmaker, is probably a heroine's journey. I've been struggling with the story because I didn't know about this concept. Now I do.

In writing as in life, we should keep learning new stuff until we're dead.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
This past weekend has been a busy one for me. First, I spent Thursday thru Sunday at Capricon, held in downtown Chicago. I had a slew of panels and events, as outlined here. I also attended a few parties and had some good meals. Then I attended a group reading hosted by Water Street Writers in Batavia. There I ran into Don Hunt, the leader of my writer's group, for the first time in-person in years. I finally got him to sign my copy of his book. Here are some more details.

The Con

Generally good. The hotel is very nice. However, being downtown, everything is expensive, from the bar to the breakfast. The party scene this year was sparce - 1 party on Thursday (although it was Tammy Coxen's so it was primo) and 3 or 4 on the other nights. Attendance was light and it did not seem to be a crowd into buying stuff.

Water Street Writers

This was my first time attending one of their events, so I can't compare it to anything. We had a crowd of 50 or so in the audience, and they seemed appreciative. The other authors and I all got an honorarium for attending so that was nice. I was dead tired after the con, so I was dragging, but everything seemed to go okay.

Now, I need to recover from my busy weekend!
chris_gerrib: (Default)
In my other job, writing, I have news. Over the weekend, I signed a contract with World Castle Publishing for them to publish what will be my fifth novel. This book, working title "Strawberry Gold" is a mystery novel set in 1986 and will be my first non-SF title. (This was formerly titled "Strawberry Creek.")

Since I literally just signed the contract (the digital ink is still drying) I don't have any details on publication dates, etc. When I do I'll post the information in the usual spots.

Profile

chris_gerrib: (Default)
chris_gerrib

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 345 67
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 10:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios