chris_gerrib: (Default)
Three random items, related only by being things I found:

1) The Bookshelf Cafe News interviewed me. My favorite quote from the interview? On being asked, "What advice would you give to a writer working on their first book?" I said, "Finish the book! Many writers start a book and abandon it or get stuck in a revision loop."

2) Here's a miserable dude who seems to want to inflict his misery on others: Meet Matthew from Knoxville! - Matthew, meet the internet!

3) On Syria: Personally I think Assad would look good hanging from a streetlight by a meat hook. Alas, he's now in Russia, hoping that Putin doesn't decide he would look better after being thrown out of a window. I do think his government's collapse in Syria points out to a "feature" of dictatorships - their collapse is gradually, then all at once.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Posted here so I can find it later, an interesting article on the obnoxious charlatan Jordan Peterson. Money quote: “The charlatan avoids responsibility; he has no real ideas. Hence he is the natural foe of precision, of intelligibility. For clarity he substitutes great heat and emphasis; he makes his pointless remarks in the most pointed manner possible.”

Coup

Jan. 7th, 2021 06:20 am
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I'm glad to see that the Republican Party is the party of law and order. Blue lives matter! (That's sarcasm, for those unclear.)

Calling Trump's coup yesterday half-assed is an insult to half-assedness, which is par for the course with Trump. And yes, it was a coup attempt, and even after half-assed coups you need to remove the coup plotters.

You see, if you plan to overthrow the government by shutting down the legislature, you need to do three things. One, send in a mob. Two, make sure that, imbedded in said mob, are some people who can take out key targets under cover of the mob. Three, be able to show up on a white horse and restore order. Fortunately, Trump's too stupid and lazy for steps 2 and 3. We got lucky.

In related thoughts, I whole-heartedly agree with John Scalzi when he says Trump is the worst President ever. From Scalzi: James Buchanan allowed the country to fall into the Civil War because he believed (erroneously, in my opinion) the principles of the country could not stop it from happening. He was wrong, terribly wrong, but at least there was a principle behind it. Trump, it is now perfectly and unambiguously clear, would be delighted to have the country fall into a civil war, not for principle, but simply for ego. He would destroy our country and democracy because he can’t abide what he now is: a loser.

Lastly, we've seen police can be polite to rioters, as long as said rioters are white. Good to know.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Over the weekend, I looked at Sidney "Release the Kraken" Powell's lawsuits attempting to reverse the Georgia and Michigan elections. They are both Rivers of Word Salad, and show that the authors are fully under the thrall of the Brain Eaters.

For those not clicking through, author John Scalzi has defined The Brain Eater as a phenomenon which sometimes happens to creative types, mostly white men, who experience a shortfall between what they expect their career path to look like and what it does. These people then develop a conspiracy theory that some cabal is conspiring against them.

When asked to explain the hows and whys of this conspiracy, one gets Rivers of Word Salad. These are lengthy documents (or, God help us all, lengthy videos) full of repetitive allegations with little or no proof. The documents are surprisingly poorly edited and formatted, and should one point out the editorial flaws, the authors become very defensive. Despite the length of these manifestos, there's no index or table of contents, making it difficult to find relevant bits. Much is made of innuendo or random associations, and sourcing is extremely weak. If two people were ever at the same large conference, well then that's proof that they are linked at the hip.

As stated above, Powell's lawsuits are prime examples of this. Just one example - the lead expert for their computer hacking arguments states that his expertise comes from being trained by the 305 Military Intelligence Battalion. Well, this is the unit that trains enlisted Military Intelligence people right after boot camp. In short, the "expert" is literally a boot recruit. Clearly The Brain Eater has feasted recently.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I am opposed to giving stupid people guns. Over the weekend, a pair of wealthy lawyers became yet another set of poster children for this premise. The pair of them came out of their house with guns to "protect" said house from a mob. Thoughts:

1) All indications were that this "mob" was no more dangerous than the crowd at the midway of your local fair.
2) If, however, one feels threatened by a mob, one should not stand in such a place that mob members can easily lob bricks at your head. Stand inside your house by an open window - much harder to be seen or hit.
3) Should the tactical situation require you to be visible to the mob, avoid verbally engaging individual mob members. While you're arguing with Mob Member #1 and distracted, Mob Member #2 can be up to no good.
4) If you have time to get your gun, you have time to put on shoes. Should matters go kinetic, the ground will quickly get covered in debris.
5) Our pair of defenders, the Straight Out of Applebee's Kids, felt they were "defending the Bastille." Given that the defenders of the Bastille lost, one should have a plan to retreat if need be. Again, shoes would be helpful.

In short, stupid is as stupid does.

WTF?

Jan. 15th, 2020 06:37 pm
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Comes news today that one of the President's golfing / Mar-El-Lago buddies, a guy named Robert Hyde, was in communication with Rudy Giuliani and other of the President's confidants. He seemed to know a lot about the comings and goings of Giuliani, et. al. in Ukraine.

Hyde also claimed to have the US Ambassador to Ukraine, a Senate-confirmed official who works for the President, under surveillance. Now, Hyde is not the most mentally-stable person you'll meet, so whether this was fact or fiction we may never know.

But the President's confidantes were working with a man who was either batshit crazy or a potential threat to the life of a senior US official! In what universe is this not immediate proof that the President is unfit for office?
chris_gerrib: (Default)
If you have a minor fender-bender, please move completely off of the road to exchange details. Do not sit in the turning lane of a major intersection during rush hour, especially if you are 10 feet away from a store parking lot. That is all.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
John Scalzi, in an annual tradition, posted his social media stats on his blog. Wily Coyote, International SuperGenius at Large, in an annual tradition, promptly posted his stats while mocking Scalzi's. To me, the whole thing looks like the owner of a fried-chicken restaurant arguing with the owner of a steak restaurant over who sold the most chicken dinners.

Scalzi Incorporated's primary revenue source is book sales. Books sold via traditional publishing outlets. The blog is a sideshow, much like the sole chicken dinner on the menu at your typical steak place. Wily Coyote's primary job is political advocacy. (That's being more polite then is perhaps necessary.) He needs the pageviews. Scalzi doesn't.

The whole thing does provide an opportunity for Wily Coyote to show his ass. Alas, there are many such opportunities and Wily misses few of them.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
An email I received today which seems totally legit to me:

We came across your resume on a job board, and we wanted to contact you regarding a job opportunity at our company.
We feel that your qualities and skills are in line with being a suitable applicant for this position.

Job Type: Home-based;
Compensation: up to $2500/month;
Prompt Start: You will start working immediately; No Investments: You do not need to make any investments to start with this position!

The position will be taking about 2-3 hrs of your time per day. Flexible Schedule.

Job Requirements:
- General knowledge of Adobe Acrobat Reader and Microsoft Office applications;
- Consistent Internet access;
- Access to printer and scanner;
- Must be accurate and attentive to details.

Duties:
Goods will be sent to your residential address.
You will have to to examine the merchandise, repack it, take pictures, make detailed reports, and reship the items to the customer.

If you wish to discuss this opportunity further, please reply to this address and HR representative will reach out to you as soon as we are able.

If the described job is not interesting to you, please do not respond to this email.

Summit Fun

Jun. 12th, 2018 02:43 pm
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I'm a bit cranky today, so be warned. I've watched our President go to two summits in as many weeks. In the first summit, he insults our closest allies and refuses to sign a joint statement with them. In the second summit, he goes and glad-hands a hereditary dictator, gets played like a piano, and declares victory. Thoughts:

1) North Korea asked for the "denuclearization of the Korean peninsula." There are only two entities that have nukes on the *peninsula* - the North Koreans and the Americans. Kim wants the *US* to cut South Korea loose from our protection.

2) We've apparently agreed to cancel military exercises on the peninsula. Since when does the United States not work with its allies because its enemy asked it to?

3) I remember all the way back to 2008 when the mere idea of talking to North Korea had the Republicans in vapors. Why are they not in vapors now? (I'll give you three guesses.)

4) This is at least the third time North Korea has promised to give up their nukes. Previous pledges were 1994 and 2006. We believe them now because?

5) Given the level of cheating before, how exactly are we supposed to trust the North Koreans?

6) Lastly, I am amazed, truly amazed, at the level of gullibility seen on pro-Trump sites. Based on this one meeting, they have decided that Kim, a man of 35, is planning to retire and convert his country into a democracy. Really? Call me about my selection of bridges for sale.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Comes news today that the author John C. Wright has penned and published a novel entitled Superluminary: The Space Vampires. Mr. Wright is better known here as the proprietor of the blog I refer to as Wrights' House of Wrong. He's also, to quote Eric Flint, a member of the Saudi School of prose in which, "no noun may go out in public unless she is veiled by grandiloquence and accompanied by an adjective."

So, perhaps I'm not exactly the target audience for Mr. Wright's latest effort. On the other hand, I remember the 1980's movie Lifeforce. (You do too - it stared Matilda May in her birthday suit running amuck in London.) And as I recall, the vampires of the movie were travelling in Hailey's comet and were the source of the vampire myths on Earth. The concept has a certain charm. So, out of boredom and a bit of mischief, (no booze - I'm stone sober) I decided to take a look at the various free samples of the book in question.

I shouldn't have bothered. Judging from what I could force myself to read of the samples, Wright has managed to suck all the lifeforce out of what could have been an interesting concept. The basic setup is this - in the far future, when man has colonized all nine planets and apparently genetically-engineered the bejesus out of himself, a faster-than-light spaceship is constructed. We're told that said construction takes all of man's efforts. The ship is then sent more-or-less blindly into interstellar space, where it discovers that all of the galaxy is dead, except for the space vampires (who are also dead), and said vampires are coming for humanity.

Except we don't discover any of this. Our POV character, Aeneas, who is apparently the pilot of the FTL ship, is told this by "Lord Pluto" and "Lady Luna." Who are these people? Damned if I know. Who is Aeneas? No clue, other than that he's nine feet tall and referred to by male pronouns. We're told that Aeneas and his unnamed ship has jumped into a double star system which we later discover is the Alpha Centauri system. Said system, at 4.3 light years away, is the nearest Sol-like system, and a logical destination.

A civilization capable of settling all nine planets would be able to build telescopes capable of seeing planets in orbit around such a star. None have been built, because Aeneas has no clue what's in the system until he gets there. Then, much incomprehensible techno-babble later, he blind-jumps out of the system into a triple system. He states, "If this had been a single star system like Sol, we’d have unwarped out of folded space directly into in the middle of a sun.... we just took a fifty-fifty life-or-death gamble without knowing the stakes or the odds."

Dude, you jumped from a single-star system (Sol) to a double (Centauri)! You really didn't know what would happen when you came back? With a ship the that took the entire civilization to build? Oh, and Mr. Wright - the distance from Earth to Moon is 1.3 light-seconds, not 1. That's probably the least of the scientific errors in the excerpts. Our astronaut has no idea what the typical planetary system looks like, despite the fact that we mere 21st century humans are finding planets like Easter eggs.

Other questions pop to mind. Do I really need to know that Lady Luna ordered a "small luncheon of fruit, salad, venison and red wine?" The blind jump takes the ship to an unknown triple star system 35 to 50 light years from Earth, yet in the immediate next chapter (or "episode") we're told the system is Zeta Herculis. How do we know this? All these and many other questions are left unanswered, buried in mountains of turgid prose. But in that same prose we keep getting told that Spaaaaccce Vampires(!!!!!) are everywhere!

Vampires in space can be done campy (Lifeforce) or serious (Peter Watts). Now we see they can be done boring and baffling (John C. Wright).

Gobsmacked

Apr. 17th, 2018 10:59 am
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I am gobsmacked, gobsmacked I tell you, at the antics of various public figures the past few days. For example:

1) Sean Hannity - Mr. Hannity has spent months defending Donald Trump, including decrying the raid on Trump's attorney. Yet never once did Hannity mention that he's used said attorney for his own legal matters. Now, since Cohen (the attorney) had all of three (3)!!! clients, common sense would suggest that one might want to mention their involvement. I mean, if Cohen had had dozens of clients, it might not be as much of an issue. But three?

2) John Ringo - per File 770, John Ringo was invited to a convention then, when people decided they weren't going to a convention that featured him, he was disinvited. Allegedly this was in part due to death threats. For a self-proclaimed tough guy and military vet, Mr. Ringo seems lacking in testicular fortitude.

3) Jon Del Arroz - here, we have an author that's publicly trolled people on the Internet filing suit to gain access to a private event that banned him due to trolling. Whatever happened to the freedom of association? It seems again we have a case where "what's good for thee is not good for me."
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I had a quiet weekend and spent most of today out-of-pocket, so this will be a brief update. It will, in fact, consist of three Tweet-level thoughts.

Thought 1 - Assault Weapons

I am and remain a gun owner. Having said that, I agree with the tweet I saw (originally from Elizabeth Bear): "here are two reasons for a private citizen to want an assault rifle. 1) to kill a lot of people as conveniently as possible. 2) because it's a neat toy." To expound on that, neither reason is protected by the Constitution.

Thought 2 - March for our Lives

I am amazed (well, not really) at how badly the NRA and their associates are showing their asses regarding the organizers of last weekend's anti-gun marches. Calling them "crisis actors" (and WTF is a "crisis actor" in the first place) and all the other slights seem almost deliberately aimed at making the NRA look like a mustache-twirling villain in a grade-Z movie.

Thought #3 - Children of the Divide

Over the weekend I finished the third of Patrick S. Tomlinson's novels, Children of the Divide. In it, Tomlinson tuckerizes another writer of my acquaintance, Adam Rakunas, and tells an interesting story of two species living together on one planet. It appears that Tomlinson left himself room for more books in the series, which I don't see forthcoming. In any event, it's well worth a read, and since it's set 18 years after the other two books, should stand alone.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
One of the things I find frankly appalling about the current state of American conservationism is their willingness to follow obvious flim-flam men. For example, David Clarke, the (just-resigned) sheriff of Milwaukee County. I can't find it at the moment, but there was a nice article by the State's Attorney of Milwaukee County noting how, under Clarke, the sheriff's office had withdrawn into doing little more than guarding the county courthouse. (This was made possible by the fact that Milwaukee County has only a couple of square miles of unincorporated terrority, mostly on or along one Interstate.)

Another example is the "minister" Joel Osteen of recent Twitter fame. The man, who is personally rich, had to be shamed into opening his church for the refugees of storm-flooded Houston. (Since when does a Christian minister get rich while being a minister?)

These men and others are clearly flim-flam artists, all talk and no cattle. Yet modern conservatives hold them up as examples and invite them to their conventions. Why?
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Over on his blog, Scott Adams insists I am in a mass hysteria bubble. Perhaps obviously, I disagree. Scott makes many statements, and herewith I take issue with two.

1) Scott says of Trump [choice 3 of 4]: A mentally unstable racist clown with conman skills (mostly just lying) eviscerated the Republican primary field and won the presidency. He keeps doing crazy, impulsive racist stuff. But for some reason, the economy is going well, jobs are looking good, North Korea blinked, ISIS is on the ropes, and the Supreme Court got a qualified judge. It was mostly luck.

I say, except for:
- The economy was doing well before Trump, and jobs were going up. In fact, Trump's signature job "save" at the Indiana Carrier plant proved to be a lie (plant's closing anyway).
- North Korea hasn't blinked. They were threatening this week to drop missiles near Guam.
- ISIS in Iraq was on the ropes before Trump. This "on the ropes" organization has also just this week staged attacks in Spain and Finland.
- The Supreme Court got a judge because Mitch McConnell blocked Obama's nominee.

2) Scott says of Trump (and this his Scott's preferred answer) [choice 4 of 4]: The guy who didn’t offer to be your moral leader didn’t offer any moral leadership, just law and order, applied equally. His critics cleverly and predictably framed it as being soft on Nazis.

I say, except for:
There was no violence on both sides. The right committed murder and assault, the left defended themselves.

Methinks I know who suffers from a mass hysteria bubble, and it ain't me.
chris_gerrib: (Me 2)
I'm going to cleanse my palate of irritation prior to heading south for The Big Turkey Dinner.

Irritating Thing #1 - The Clintons

So I voted for Hillary Clinton as the best politician on offer. But I did and do find some of her actions irritating. For example, the Right claims that when the Clintons moved out of the White House in 2000, they stole a bunch of furniture. Well, the truth is they didn't, but if you click the link you'll see it's not cut-and-dried.

And that's what irritates me about both of them, and what I think ended up costing Hillary the election. They run right up to the edge of impropriety, take a good look around, then stop just before the line. Not only that, they do so with high levels of secrecy. This then leaves their defenders making ponderous explanations.

Irritating Thing #2 - The "Roman" Salute

I also note that the various alt-right folks running out of the woodwork like cockroaches in the dark have taken to calling the good-old-fashioned "Heil Hitler" salute a "Roman" salute. Again, the salute's history is complicated (the tl;dr version is it ain't really Roman and it's got fascist fingerprints all over it) but all this wink-nod "Roman" crap ain't fooling nobody.
chris_gerrib: (Me 2)
So, audio tape of Donald Trump being an ass (or being Donald Trump, but that's redundant) was released. It reveals nothing new, but does pop Trumpishness into the minds of those voters who are just now turning their attention to the race.

Scott Adams of Dilbert fame (about whom I wrote here) is on vacation. Despite this, Scott decided to write a few hundred words on how this will actually help Trump, about whom Scott is 98% sure will win the election.

Scott says: That opens the door for Trump to attack in a proportionate way. No more mister-nice-guy. Gloves are off. Nothing is out of bounds. It is fair to assume that Bill and Hillary are about to experience the worst weeks of their lives.

To which I say:Are you smoking dope? How can Bill's infidelities be held against Hillary? How does a man on wife #3 attack a couple on marriage #1? Please proceed, Governor Mr. Trump.

Scott Says: I assume that 75% of male heads of state, including our own past presidents, are total dogs in their private lives. Like it or not, Trump is normal in that world.

To which I say: Wasn't Bill Clinton a head of state?

Scott says:But if the new battleground is spousal fidelity, you have to like Trump’s chances.

To which I say: Three divorces.
chris_gerrib: (Me 2)
Periodically, in my wanderings on the Internet, I find myself asking what planet people are on. Today brings a bumper crop of these questions.

1) Donald "The Orange Rage" Trump posted several Tweets overnight about Alicia Machado. Now, here on Planet Earth (3rd rock from the sun), an overweight 70-year-old man with three wives, the most recent of which is younger than some of his children would (at least) shut up about Machado. He might even apologize. He would not launch a 3 ayem rant about her on Twitter. Talk about not being ready for the "3 AM phone call."

2) Related to the above, the commentary on several conservative sites has been "Hillary set Trump up." This may be true, but here on Planet Earth (3rd rock from the sun) if you know something's a setup you don't fall into the trap. Actually, that's true even on Admiral Ackbar's planet.

3) Over on the site ran by Wily E. Coyote, SuperGenius (tm) (just ask him, he'll tell you how smart he is) I see a lengthy post about how Trump "avoided the minefield of defeating Hillary Clinton in the first presidential debate." Spanking is involved. That may play on some planets, but here on Planet Earth (3rd rock from the sun) it's not.

4) Also on the Coyote's site, there's a long post about how the US couldn't impose a no-fly zone in Syria but how Hillary's supporters want us to. Here on Planet Earth (3rd rock from the sun) I see no real appetite for any expansion of our (modest) role in Syria.
chris_gerrib: (Me 2)
Last night, for the second night in a row, the Trump campaign robocalled me. Both calls followed a very similar format. The call opened with a recording of Trump yelling one of his applause lines at a rally (audience background noise audible). Last night it was "law and order" and the night before it was "Hillary Rotten Clinton." Then, the recording switched to a man speaking with all the urgency of the guy on late-night TV selling Ginzu knives. He urged me to press one immediately to register my support and donate to help Trump.

WTF? Specifically:

1) I'm not a Republican. I've given money to Democrats, and anybody with any computer tech should have figured that out.

2) Illinois (my home state) is not in play. IIRC, last time we went for a Republican for President it was when Reagan was running.

3) Who exactly is this call supposed to persuade? I mean, couldn't Trump at least record a special message for me as opposed to recycled yelling in my ear?
chris_gerrib: (Me 2)
I have an IRA and a money market account with Vanguard. Over the past week, I've tried to add money to the IRA and write a check off of the money market account. Both transactions failed.

When I tried to add money to the IRA, Vanguard attempted to pull the cash from an account I don't have at a bank I don't use. When I wrote a check, Vanguard told me that they've stopped using those checks, and that my account did not have check writing features. I am not happy.

Profile

chris_gerrib: (Default)
chris_gerrib

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 345 67
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 10:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios