Date: 2009-11-05 06:41 am (UTC)
Tell me again why we need more F-22s?

Because procurement policy for a leading-edge fighter which will probably still be in service decades from now needs to take into account more than simply the needs of the absolute present. The F-15 first flew in 1972 and the F-18 in 1979: what will we do for air superiority 10-20 years from now, when the F-15 is obsolete and the F-18 obsolescent? At that time, our F-22's will be filling the role that the F-18's are now, as the now second-line fighter.

It is much more expensive to start and stop and start a production line than it is to keep it running. 145 F-22's will probably not be enough for the long run, and so we will either have to restart the production line in 2013 or so, when we have a real President again, or start the line on an entirely new fighter, which won't be airworthy until the late 2010's. (The F-35 is more of a fighter-bomber than an air superiority fighter: it can't fill the same role.)

Obama has done something which looks thrifty, but is liable to cost us more, in both gold and blood, before the story's over.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

chris_gerrib: (Default)
chris_gerrib

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6 78 910 1112
13141516 17 1819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 09:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios