3 Ayem

Nov. 26th, 2013 08:46 am
chris_gerrib: (Me)
My wake-up call today was 3 in the AM, because I was serving as airport shuttle service, and my shuttle-ees had a 6 AM flight. I got them to the airport, went home, and got an hour nap on my recliner so I'm good.

I noticed that I hadn't posted much about my recent California trip. This is not because the trip wasn't fun (it was) just not perhaps as noteworthy as some of my others. Death Valley is unique, but nowhere near as spectacular as the Grand Canyon or a redwoods forest. I did have a thought, namely groceries.

While staying outside Death Valley, in the tiny (or at least highly unpopulated) town of Amargosa Valley, NV, I ended up gossiping with the "local" Schwan's delivery man. I put "local" in quotes because the guy was based in Pahrump and covered several thousand square miles.

For those not in the know, Schwan's sells all kinds of frozen groceries, and they deliver (apparently anywhere) in distinctive beige trucks. When I was a kid, we briefly bought stuff from them, but apparently Mom could find the same stuff cheaper at the local supermarket.

There is no "local supermarket" in Amargosa Valley. The nearest supermarket is in Pahrump, 50 miles down the road. And Amargosa is, by local standards, fairly close to the big city. There are several towns in the area even more remote. In short, frozen food delivered to your door is a big deal out there. Food for thought.
chris_gerrib: (Pirates of Mars)
No Rotary today. It's the last week of the outgoing President's term, and since he had nothing of importance to do, we're just skipping it. This is good - I have an inspection on my new house this afternoon. So, in honor (?) of that, have some random randomness.

A) There are a lot of TVs and movies in which the characters are shooting guns, yet one rarely if ever sees the actors wearing hearing protection. How do said actors avoid going deaf? Even blanks make noise.

B) From Gin and Tacos, reflections on why some people are obese. Tl;dr version = for some people, eating is the highlight of their day. When I was in the Navy and the ship was underway, I was in this boat, pun intended.

C) Regarding the Snowden affair, my thoughts closely mirror those of Lawyers, Guns and Money.

D) A marker for further discussion - arguments from my opponent believes something. I find these extremely annoying.
chris_gerrib: (Me)
Thought The First

Being smart is not the same as being wise or right. Many smart people tried to treat fevers by bleeding the patient. Most wise people are smart, but not all. Wisdom includes things like judgment, risk management, and understanding what you don't know. Right, well that includes actual research and investigation.

Thought The Second

We are told that there is an "epidemic" of obesity, and we are also told that being obese is a major health risk. There is also evidence that being overweight can improve your resistance to decease. Here's my admittedly unscientific thought - what's really unhealthy is a lack of exercise. The problem is that there is a very high correlation between obesity and lack of exercise. It's difficult, perhaps even impossible, to separate the two factors when doing a study on health.

Thought The Third

A staple of science fiction stories is having the Space Patrol charge people for rescuing them. This professional rescuer thinks that's a bad idea. The article is well-written, but the tl;dr version is:

1) In the world of ships, commercial vessels also rescue each other. Do we want them to charge-back for a rescue?

2) Many rescues are needed due to bad decisions on the part of the rescue-ees. Do we want the financial cost of rescue cause them to make more bad decisions like not calling for help, thus leading to more dangerous rescues?

Gutbomb!

Apr. 12th, 2013 03:38 pm
chris_gerrib: (Me)
I had a hankering for Chinese at lunch today. I was unable to find a Chinese restaurant, so I went to Panda Express, where I ordered my usual - fried rice, orange chicken and beef with broccoli, washed down with a Diet Coke.

Now, I have no illusions that orange chicken is anything but bad for you, but the placard of 400 calories per serving got my attention. So, thanks to the miracle of Google and a slow afternoon, I ran the calories as per Panda's handy online calculator. The result? 1010 calories! Ouch!

More gym, less Panda.

765

Nov. 4th, 2012 01:14 pm
chris_gerrib: (Default)
(Since Monday at work promises to be hectic, have Monday's post today)

Per the receipt for my rental car, I drove 765 miles on last week's vacation. That's almost half of my California trip of last year, but the Houston - San Antonio - Austin triangle is smaller than the Northern California area. Herewith, some random thoughts and a bonus picture.

First the picture. Here's a graphic illustration of the rocket equation: All of this stuff below was launched and only the small brown capsule came back:

rocket equation

Random Thoughts

1) Austin, Texas has to be the worst city ever to drive in! The roads wander aimlessly, are poorly-marked and are jammed with traffic.

2) Thanks to Brett Wolfson's recommendation about seeing the USS Texas (more in a later post) I discovered the National Museum of the Pacific War in lovely Fredericksburg Texas. It was well worth the trip.

3) Thanks to Fredericksburg, I discovered Texas wine and Make-in-Texas bourbon. It was an interesting way to spend an afternoon!

Day 1

Jun. 11th, 2012 10:46 am
chris_gerrib: (Default)
If you would have asked me last week whether or not I was eating healthy, I would have said "yes." I thought I was following Phase 3 of the South Beach Diet.

Well, I sat down this weekend and looked at the book versus what I was eating. I have decided that I was actually on the "sea food" diet. You know, see food, eat food. I looked at calories and carbs of a couple of my regular food choices, and discovered that they have little or no relationship to a diet, South Beach or otherwise.

So, I am, officially as of this morning, on Phase 1 of the South Beach Diet. This is no sugar (duh!) no carbs, no fruit, no booze and lean meat portion of the proceedings. (Fortunately, it's only 2 weeks) The goal is to re-establish a better baseline metabolism. Hopefully, between that and continued exercise, I'll make the changes needed.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
In this case, that's a literal question. I've been going to the same grocery store for a decade, and I've memorized where things are, or at least "where things I buy are." For various reasons, including but not limited to tore-up kitchen and being out of town, I haven't gone there for a month or so.

Now I return to find that they are remodeling. People, I spent a decade learning this store. Don't move it now!

I suspect that at least one move is driven by the store's suppliers. See, it used to be that Coke and Pepsi were on shelves facing each other. Since I drink the diet versions of either, I'd buy whichever was on sale that week. Now, Coke is on one shelf, and you need to walk behind that shelf (past an increased selection of store-brand stuff) and over to the next aisle for Pepsi. Aha, I say, aha!
chris_gerrib: (Default)
My new mattress came Saturday, so for the first time in a month I slept in the master bedroom. My construction guy has a few final clean-up items, including door knobs for the bedroom (it broke on him while he was inside, forcing him to cut the knob off), but the house is almost done. Just in time for me to fly out on business and then our annual Rotary weekend in Wisconsin. Such is life. Also, due to my on-the-roadedness, posting here may be light.

In other news, Pete's Fresh Market opened up a couple of blocks from my house. It's number nine of a small Chicago-area grocery chain. I did my regular weekend shopping there. As one would expect from a "fresh" market, they have a spectacular produce section, and a really impressive meat and deli section. They also have a large buffet area, where one can buy ready-to-eat stuff and eat there or take home.

What they lack is some of the stuff that I personally want in a grocery store. For example, the only "dark" pop they had in diet was Dr. Pepper. Their cookie selection was slim, as was their bakery. Now, Chicago is not short of grocery stores, so if you're running an independent operation, you need to differentiate yourself by providing stuff the big guys don't, so I get the marketing strategy. Unfortunately, I'm not a fan of making two grocery store runs, so we'll see how much business I end up giving Pete.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Anybody remember the old Leonard Nimoy I-need-to-pay-the-bills-SOMEHOW vehicle "In Search Of...?" You know, the one where Nimoy did the voice-over for all those quacks looking for Atlantis or UFOs? Well, this is my reboot of that concept.

1) It turns out that Groundhog Day is related (vaguely) to Imbolc AKA Candlemas. There were a number of pagan and Christian festivals half-way between winter solstice and spring, largely devoted to answering the question "do we have enough food to make it to spring?"

2) A two-fer from [livejournal.com profile] jaylake. First, for most of human history, there were multiple species of human wandering around. Second, 25 things I learned from opening a bookstore.

3) So, I dragged my butt to the health club Wednesday, and will again today. I am officially Out. Of. Shape. Well, unless "round and pudgy" counts as a shape. I'm not trying to be Mister Universe, but avoiding Mister Couch Spud would be nice.

4) I bought and tried the original Fiber One cereal. You know, the stuff that's heavily-advertised. It looked like mouse turds and tasted like sawdust with a little sugar. Yuck. The non-original AKA "good" flavors have about the same amount of sugar in them as Froot Loops. Back to Cheerios am I.

5) I sent out about 250 postcards to various book stores touting my book. At a buck a card, including postage, it was cheap. At least one card was received and will become an order. One down and 249 to go.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Because I have a few short and unrelated comments vs one big post:

A) Over the previous weekend, I viewed on pay-per-view the recent movie Cowboys and Aliens. I paid (the same money) for the "unedited" version, hoping to see more of Olivia Wilde. Alas, not so you'd notice, but I did find the movie a perfectly entertaining SF / shoot-em-up, with a side of blow-stuff-up-real-good.

B) Also on the entertainment front, I re-read the classic pirate novel, Treasure Island. I had forgotten a whole sequence where Jim steals back the Hispaniola. It was an entertaining romp with a classic.

C) Remember when ordering lobster was a big deal? I was at Red Lobster last night, killing two birds with one stone by finishing Christmas shopping and eating dinner, and noticed that they had three lobster and steak combos for under $20! Now, one will note that the steak is small and the lobster is neither fresh nor from Maine, but still, ordering lobster used to be a big deal. Not any more.

D) An interesting graphical link (you may have to click through an ad to see it) Correlation or Causation? Need to prove something you already believe? Statistics are easy: All you need are two graphs and a leading question.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
1) More good news on the bio-fuel front: using E.Coli to speed up fuel production

2) A long but interesting article on how saltpeter was used to make ice cream.

3) Just a reminder the "Climategate" was a crock: Michael Mann cleared AGAIN of all wrongdoing.

4) David Brin with some interesting thoughts on Seasteading and World Government.

5) The perils of flying while black and the idiocy of our current air travel "security."

6) On a lighter note, my Mom makes the local newspaper.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
Two random thoughts, related only by being results of modern science and of interest to me.

First, various folks, including my friend [livejournal.com profile] jeff_duntemann have argued that high-fructose corn syrup, used in place of sugar in thousands of processed foods, is the cause of America's obesity epidemic. Basically, the argument is that we metabolize fructose differently than sucrose (table sugar). It turns out that a new study from Princeton University supports this theory.

Apparently rats fed fructose, even under some calorie restrictions, will put on more weight than sucrose-fed rats at a higher calorie level. Since I've stated in the past that I wasn't convinced of the "fructose theory," it looks like I'll have to change my opinion.

Second, the question of whether or not you can have a stealthy ship is space is always of interest to science fiction writers. After all, if the Martian Space Fleet can sit in Martian orbit and watch the Terran Space Fleet leave Earth orbit, surprise attacks become difficult. The fascinating site Project Rho argues that this is the case. (Warning - space geeks can easily loose an afternoon at the Project Rho site - visit at your own risk!)

Not so fast, says the guy behind the blog Built on Facts. First, he points out that interior heat is not the same as hull temperature. It's actually a measure of energy output needed to hold a given temperature inside - just like the exterior of your oven isn't as hot as the inside. Second, this energy is broadcast, so hull shape and size matters.

At any rate, he ran the numbers. For a ship with an energy output of 10,000 watts and searching for it with a 24 inch telescope, he came up with a detectability range of 5.9 million kilometers. This is still a goodly distance - 15 times the distance from the Earth to the Moon - but only 10% of the distance to Mars at opposition - the closest point on our orbits.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I'm overweight. Not massively so, but still, it's not debatable. Like most people, I'm overweight because my caloric intake exceeds my caloric output.

Recognizing the fact that I'm overweight, I looked around for a solution. I came to the realization that controlling my weight can be thought of as a game. The trick, then, is to find a game that I like to play.

Now, this could be a traditional game, like, basketball. I know how to play basketball, and played it at school all through grade school and high school. But I don't actually like to play basketball. I played in school because that's what one did in a small Central Illinois town, and when the season was over, I didn't play.

Fortunately, I've found a game that I like to play, and it's called the South Beach Diet. Essentially, the South Beach diet consists of several ways to reduce one's caloric intake without counting calories. Some of the rules include:

1) Avoid hidden sugar. For example, most folks drink a glass of fruit juice with breakfast. What most people don't know is that the typical glass of juice has the same amount of sugar as an equivalent amount of pop. Also, a lot of "healthy" breakfast cereals, such as raisin bran, have quite a bit of added sugar.

2) Skip the starches. Potatoes are limited to an occasional thing. (That McDonald's regular-sized order of fries is like 300 calories). Rice is only marginally better, especially white rice. I've found that a lot of places will gladly substitute steamed vegetables for a starch.

3) Processed flour is not your friend. White flour is low on nutrients and high in sugar. Wheat flour is better, although in general, baked goods should be enjoyed in moderation.

I first went on this diet about three years ago, and it worked. Last year, I stopped playing the game. Unfortunately, diets are like golf - higher scores are worse then low scores!
chris_gerrib: (Default)
So I read in today's New York Times (I think found it via instapundit) that there is no proof for the contention that a low-fat diet is particularly good for you.

So how come the surgeon general said in 1988 that a high-fat diet was a public health menace comparable to cigarettes? Well, that was the consensus scientific opinion of the time. Gary Taubes, whose book, “Good Calories, Bad Calories was reviewed in the article, claims this was a "concensus cascade."

Concensus cascades happen where a group of people, or even an individual, express a strong (if mistaken) opinion on a matter of some doubt. If other people then assume that the first person was right and say they agree, latecomers to the debate then feel greatly pressured to join the consensus. By 1988, the consensus was so strong that we had a "reputation cascade" - people who disagreed with the consensus were assumed to be paid agents for, in this case, the meat and dairy industry.

Now, if this sounds anything like what might be happening with the global warming debate, the similarities are purely coincidental. If you believe that, I've got a bridge for sale in Brooklyn. Nor is this a new phenomenon. Go read up on the consensus about luminiferous ether.

I personally think the Earth's average temperature is rising, and mankind is at least partially at fault. I thought at one time that the three Duke lacrosse players were guilty. Fortunately, this belief had to be tested in a court of law. In the end, it proved not to be strong enough to even step foot in a court.

Consensus is not proof. We as a society need to always challenge conventional wisdom, consensus and things "everybody knows." Usually, the consensus is right. But testing that consensus is healthy and necessary, and calling people who do that testing dupes is wrong.
chris_gerrib: (Default)
I wish I was AT the links, instead of writing links for blog postings. Oh well.

John Scalzi's finally got his main blog fixed. He bit the bullet and changed blogging software. At any rate, he's found a cluster of interesting stuff.

How to Fire in France is a very interesting post, outlining how one goes about actually firing somebody in France. The author, an American ex-pat, has a humorous take on it. Now, lest one think the guy's a raving Ayn Rand conservative, his other blog hobby is bashing G. W. Bush. What I found most interesting was the second comment, whereby somebody attempted to defend the asinine French rules.

Also from Scalzi (via one of his paid blogs, By The Way, are two articles about Alzheimer's. My grandfather died of that disease, so I found both of them quite interesting. One claims that Alzheimer's is a form of diabetes.

Lastly, [livejournal.com profile] ann_totusek found a
link suggesting that low cholesterol leads to premature babies.

I think we're discovering how much we don't know about how our bodies work, and how influential diet is. I also think that we're discovering (slowly and painfully) that sex, age and even genetic disposition are important factors in what you should be eating. No, I'm not a doctor and don't even play one on TV, but there appears to be evidence that there is no one good diet for everybody.

Profile

chris_gerrib: (Default)
chris_gerrib

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 45
6 78 910 1112
13141516 17 1819
2021222324 2526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 06:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios