chris_gerrib: (Default)
[personal profile] chris_gerrib
In yesterday's entry, I mentioned that the four books on my "to be considered for a Hugo list" were three apples and an orange. (Three SF action novels and one fantasy). Jason Robertson ([livejournal.com profile] pyropyga) said, in effect, "it's okay to be biased to apples vs. oranges." Although I appreciate the vote of confidence, that's not exactly my problem. My problem with the decision is two-fold:

1) Oranges are not apples - what makes a good orange makes a lousy apple, and vice versa. In other words, comparing fantasy to SF can be difficult, since they are separate things. Granted, they are both novels, so it's not entirely out of the realm of possible, but still.

2) I'm not a regular shopper for oranges. Gaiman's The Graveyard Book will be only the second fantasy novel I've read this year. The first is [livejournal.com profile] jimhines's book The Stepsister Scheme. So, I assume that the fantasy fans like Gaiman, but I have very little basis to evaluate that assumption.

I guess what I'm thinking is that it would be nice to have the Hugos structured like the Emmys, where you vote for "best comedy" as well as "best drama." Just a thought.

Profile

chris_gerrib: (Default)
chris_gerrib

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 10 111213 1415
16 17 1819202122
23 2425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 30th, 2025 05:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios